The relationship of profit, cash flow and working capital of enterprises
Abstract
On the basis of theoretical studies such basic concepts as «monetary flow», «flow of funds» and «cash-flow» are identified. These indicators can act as the main targets and the criterion of success of the enterprise. It is proved that these concepts are not identical but are closely linked. The relationship between cash flow and the company's cash resources is shown schematically. It is determined that the monetary flow are the interval indicators; fundsaremoment indicators. The funds are part of the working capital of the enterprise. Flow of funds affects the change in working capital. It is noted that with the adoption of national accounting and reporting standards the «Flow statement» has been changed. But it still remains the main source for users of financial statements to reflect the full, true and unbiased information about the changes that occurred in cash and cash equivalents of the enterprise for the period. The main reasons for the profit and cash flow are not the same. The theoretical methods of investigation are used in this research. The industrial enterprises have become the sphere of the results application. They are confirmed by the calculations presented in the article.
Keywords
References
Bilyk, M., Nadtochiy, S. (2007). Groshovi potoky pidpryemstv u mikro ta makroekonomichnomu aspekti. Finansy Ukrainy, 6, 133-147.
Kharchenko, V. (2009). Groshovyy obig i groshovi potoky pidpryemstva. Visnyk ekonomichoy nauky Ukrainy, 2, 160-163.
Varenik, V. (2014). Diagnostychyy analiz groshovykh potokiv natsionalnoy ekonomiky. Ekonomichyy nobelivskyy visnyk, 1(7), 87-94.
Podderogin, A. Nevmerzhytskyy Ya. (2007). Efektyvnist upravlinnya groshovymy potokamy pidpryemstva Finansy Ukrainy, 11, 119-127.
Golovko, T. (2016). Klasyfikatsiya groshovykh potokiv pidpryemstva. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, 2, 246-251.
Koshelek, G. (2013). Klasyfikatsiya groshovykh potokiv pidpryemstva u suchasnykh umovakh. Zovnishya torgivlya: ekonomika finansy pravo, 1(66), 32-40.
Sokirska, I. (2015). Groshovyy potik yak vazhlyvyy chynnyk prynyattya upravlinskich rishen. Biznes Inform, 10, 366-372.
Sinelnik, L. (2013). Chistyy groshovyy potik yak vnutrishne dzherelo finansuvannya pidpryemstva. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 6, 98-102.
Bilyk, M., Pavlovska, O., Prytulyak, N., Nevmerzhytska, N. (2005). Finansovyy analiz, Kyiv, KNEU.
Keyns, Dzh. (2008). Obschaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta, i deneg, EKSMO, Мoscow.
Ezerskaya, O. (n.d.). Groshovyy potik – prychina konflikta sobstvennikov і top-menedzheriv. Retrieved from: http://bizentropy.biz/articles/77-denezhnyj-potok-prichina-konflikta-sobstvennikov-i-top-menedzherov.html.
Lysenko, N. (2009). Kak upravlyat groshovym potokom. Finansovyy director, 3. Retrieved from: http://www.kareta.com.ua.
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Ekonomichnyy analiz
Articles are distributed under Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY-NC 4.0)
Science Works Journal "Ekonomichnyy analiz"
ISSN 1993-0259 (Print) ISSN 2219-4649 (Online) DOI: 10.35774/econa
© West Ukrainian National University
© «Ekonomichnyy analiz», 2007-2023