Provision of maturity of project management: methodical approaches and practical implementation
Abstract
Introduction. In recent years, there has been a rethinking of the role of project management in the domestic business in ensuring effective implementation of strategic development plans for companies, ensuring their market success in the face of increasing competition, effective management of the current activities of firms that are project-oriented. This means that, regardless of the specifics of the activity, all companies implement various projects. However, they can be divided into process- and project-oriented. Regardless of which of these two groups the enterprise belongs, there is a need to use project management tools – either in the context of operational activities for the project-oriented business, or for the implementation of various projects in traditional manufacturing or service companies. Accordingly, there is a need to assess the maturity level of project management in order to identify ways for its further development and improvement.
Insufficient attention and awareness of the importance of professional project management are typical of Ukrainian small business enterprises. In the course of their business activities, these entities often work in project-oriented industries on the one hand, and remain quite ignorant about the implementation and development of project management on the other. Their weaknesses are the lack or low quality of application of its methods and tools, ignoring modern developments and innovations in the field of management.
Purpose. To substantiate the author's model of maturity of project management and to determine its effectiveness for domestic small business enterprises.
Method (methodology). The methods of scientific generalization were used in substantiation of theoretical approaches of maturity models; methods of general scientific abstraction, induction and deduction – when developing an authoritative model of project management maturity; analysis and synthesis – to implement the author's model in the practical activity of enterprises.
Results. The scientific results of the work include the author's model, which allows to establish the level of development of the enterprise in the implementation of the project activity. It has been empirically proven that the proposed model is based on the assessment of project management by 24 qualitative indicators and aims to determine one of three levels of maturity: the initial level, the level of formation and the level of sustainable development; contributes to improving the quality of project implementation for small businesses.
Keywords
References
Materials Standish Group. (1994). Retrieved from: www.pm2go.com/sample_research/ chaos_1994_1.asp.
CMU/SEI-93-TR-025 «Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1». (1994). Retrieved from: www.sei.cmu.edu/ publications/documents/93.reports/93.tr.025.html.
Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. (2019). Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
Dzyubina, A. V. (2010). Model' zrilosti upravlinnya proektamy dlya vitchyznyanykh pidpryyemstvyu. Natsional'nyy universytet «L'vivs'ka politekhnika», 235-239. Retrieved from: http://ena.lp.edu.ua/bitstream/ntb/11396/1/41.pdf.
Malinina, M. V. (2011). Sovremennye modeli zrelosti orhanizatsyonnoho upravleniya proektamy. Upravlenie proektami i programmami, 03 (27), 228-239.
Molokanova, V. M. (2009). Model' zhyttyevoho tsyklu yak osnova proektnoho upravlinnya. Upravlinnya proektamy ta rozvytok vyrobnytstva, 3 (31), 30-37. Retrieved from: http://www.pmdp.org.ua/images/Journal/31/09mvmopu.pdf.
Sarychev, D. O. (2014). Otsinyuvannya zrilosti protsesiv upravlinnya proektamy: teoriya i praktyka. Ekonomika ta upravlinnya pidpryyemstvamy, 131–144.
Bezuhlyy, D. H. (2015). Pidkhid do otsinyuvannya rivnya proektnoyi zrilosti orhaniv mistsevoho samovryaduvannya. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnya, 11-12, 89–97.
Ivko, A. V. (2017). Analiz metodolohiy rozroblennya virtual'nykh proektnykh ofisiv budivel'noyi lohistyky. Visnyk L'vivs'koho derzhavnoho universytetu bezpeky zhyttyediyal'nosti, 15, 7–16.
Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3). (n. d.) Project Management Institute, Inc. Retrieved from: https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/organizational-pm-maturity-model-opm3-third-edition.
Uzbekova, A. M. (2017). Analyz upravlenyya proektamy po sredstvom modeley zrelosty. Nauchnye zapiski molodykh issledovateley, 4, 16-22. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/analiz-upravleniyaproektami-posredstvom modeley-zrelosti.
Chudynova, N. K. (2012). Analiz modeley zrelosti upravleniya proektami. Permskyy fylyal Natsyonal'noho issledovatel'skoho unyversiteta Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. Retrieved from: https://publications.hse.ru/en/chapters/73926356.
Kertsner, H. (2003). Stratehicheskoe planirovanie dlya upravleniya proektamy s ispol'zovaniem modeli zrelosti. Moscow: AyTyPress.
Narbaev, T. S. (2016). Otsenka zrelosti upravleniya proektami v Kazakhstane. Upravlenye proektamy y prohrammamy, 02 (46), 144-163. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309904368_Ocenka_zrelosti_Upravlenia_proektami_v_Kaza1hstane.
Dehtyarev, M. A. (2015). Proektnaya zrelost' i tsennostno-oryentirovannoe upravlenie proektami. Retrieved from: http://www.i-mash.ru/materials/economy/print:page,1,64524-proektnaja-zrelost-i-cennostno-orientirovannoe.html.
Bredikhin, V. M. (2017). Upravlinnya proektamy: problemy ta perspektyvy. Molodyy vchenyy, 4.4 (44.4), 9-12.
Demynh, E. (1994). Vykhod iz krizisa. Tver': Al'ba.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35774/econa2020.01.01.022
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Articles are distributed under Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY-NC 4.0)
Science Works Journal "Ekonomichnyy analiz"
ISSN 1993-0259 (Print) ISSN 2219-4649 (Online) DOI: 10.35774/econa
© West Ukrainian National University
© «Ekonomichnyy analiz», 2007-2023