Cost management of enterprises based on the concept of sustainable development

Olena Zamula, Oleksii Zamula


Abstract


Introduction. One of the factors that affects the effectiveness of the cost management system is the formation of an effective methodology for determining the cost of production, which would contribute to successful pricing and the success of the enterprise in the long term. In this process, it is necessary to take into account that recently business structures have undergone fundamental changes that relate to the gradual introduction of the concept of sustainable development into the mechanisms of management decision-making.

Purpose. The article is devoted to the issues of improving the theoretical and methodological principles of cost management of economic entities based on the existing achievements of economic science and taking into account the positional foundations of the concept of sustainable development of enterprises. In this regard, it is appropriate to analyze the existing cost management systems and the latest trends in the development of management as a science, as it will make it possible to identify the shortcomings of current methods, as well as outline ways to eliminate them and adapt them to conceptual changes in economic realities.

The methodology of this study is based on the systematization, timing and analysis of existing scientific works, as well as the foundations of the theory of management decision-making.

Results. In order to achieve the established strategic goals in the cost management of the enterprise, its managers are suggested, based on the assessment of the internal and external environment, to choose the appropriate methodology, which should include the following elements: methods of measurement, accumulation, attribution of costs per unit of production, as well as methods of drawing up and analyzing management reports accounting for the development of alternatives. The emergence of the concept of sustainable development became a new stage in increasing the responsibility of managers in terms of decision-making regarding the use of resources. Currently, when choosing the optimal alternative, it becomes almost impossible to ignore the social and environmental consequences of its practical implementation without losing reputation, prospects for further successful functioning. At the same time, the sphere of influence of persons responsible for decision-making expanded to the limits of the influence of factors of indirect influence. Cost management methods based on the concept of sustainable development of the enterprise require further development.


Keywords


cost management method; strategic positioning; production; cost; sustainable development of the enterprise; decision-making

Full Text:

PDF

References


Piskun, A. V. (2020). Teoretychnyi aspekt upravlinnia vytratamy pidpryiemstva. Naukovyi pohliad: ekonomika ta upravlinnia, 4 (70), 55-59 [in Ukrainian].

Holikov, O. I., & Mykolaieva, N. A. (2014). Osnovy klasyfikatsii i metody upravlinnia vytratamy v systemi stratehichnoho upravlinskoho obliku. Azymut naukovykh doslidzhen: ekonomika i upravlinnia, 1, 26-30 [in Ukrainian].

Ostapenko, T. M. (2013). Ekonomichna sutnist upravlinnia vytratamy. Visnyk Sumskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika, 2, 85-91 [in Ukrainian].

Markina, I. A., Voronina, V. L., & Rudych, A. I. (2020). Teoretychni osnovy upravlinnia vytratamy pidpryiemstva. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Ekonomika ta pidpryiemnytstvo, 4 (115), 140-147 [in Ukrainian].

Borysiuk, I. O., & Semeniaka, Ya. V. (2017). Formuvannia systemy upravlinnia vytratamy pidpryiemstva. Modern economics, 6, 15-23 [in Ukrainian].

Nazarenko, T. P., Franchuk, I. B., & Viter, S. A. (2021). Metodychni aspekty obliku ta upravlinnia vytratamy na vyrobnytstvo produktsii. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 7, 83-89 [in Ukrainian].

Hlushach, Yu. S., & Falchenko, O. O. (2021). Metodychni aspekty obliku vytrat ta kalkuliuvannia sobivartosti produktsii u vitchyznianii ta zarubizhnii oblikovii praktytsi. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-29-49 [in Ukrainian].

Tarasenko, S. I. (2015). Intehrovana kontseptsiia upravlinnia vytratamy pidpryiemstva. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 13(4), 84-87 [in Ukrainian].

Pustova, I. V. (2013). Metody upravlinnia vytratamy v suchasnykh umovakh: efektyvnist zastosuvannia, perevahy ta nedoliky. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 11, 39-42 [in Ukrainian].

Nesterenko, S. A. (2019). Teoretychni aspekty ta metodolohichni pidkhody upravlinnia vytratamy. Visnyk KhNAU. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 1, 13-22 [in Ukrainian].

Hryshko, N. V. (2007). Suchasni kontseptsii upravlinnia vytratamy promyslovykh pidpryiemstv. Kultura narodov Prychernomoria, 99, 33-38 [in Ukrainian].

Burachek, I. V., & Ishchuk, V. A. (2017). Evoliutsiia kontseptsii upravlinnia vytratamy pidpryiemstva. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, 13, 388-393 [in Ukrainian].

Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. (2002, Vol. VI). Kyiv: Abrys [in Ukrainian].

Radionova, N. Y. (2018). Klasyfikatsiia vytrat pidpryiemstva yak instrument upravlinnia. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti, 64, 74-80 [in Ukrainian].

Bashnianyn, H. I., & Iftemichuk, V. S. (2004). Heneza rynkovoi ekonomiky: terminy, poniattia, personalii. Kyiv: Mahnoliia plius [in Ukrainian].

Kapinos, H. I., & Babii, I. V. (2004). Systemy normuvannia v upravlinni vyrobnychoiu diialnistiu. Khmelnytskyi: KhDU [in Ukrainian].

Ivanenko, V. O. (2012). Dodana vartist yak obiekt analizu statystychnoi zvitnosti promyslovykh pidpryiemstv z vyrobnytstva produktsii. Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu, 1 (22), 122-130 [in Ukrainian].

Koshkalda, L. Yu., & Radieva, O. H. (2018). Metodyka analizu tochky bezzbytkovosti. Pryazovskyi ekonomichnyi visnyk, 6(11), 626-528 [in Ukrainian].

Svynous, I. V., Havryk, O. Yu., & Ivanova, L. S. (2016). Ekonomichnyi zmist vytrat vyrobnytstva v systemi upravlinnia silskohospodarskym pidpryiemstvom. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 17, 17-21 [in Ukrainian].

Mostenska, T. L., & Tur, O. V. (2018). Rol lantsiuha stvorennia tsinnosti u zabezpechenni konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu, 4, 75– 84 [in Ukrainian].

Ekonomichna entsyklopediia. (2000–2002, Vol.3). Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr «Akademiia» [in Ukrainian].

Brahina, O. S., & Zabrodna, I. O. (2021). Rozrobka stratehichnoho pidkhodu do upravlinnia vytratamy pidpryiemstva. Ekonomichnyi zhurnal Odeskoho politekhnichnoho universytetu, 3 (17), 19-25 [in Ukrainian].

Shevchuk, V.Ia. (2006). Makroekonomichni problemy staloho rozvytku. Kyiv: Heoprynt [in Ukrainian].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35774/econa2022.03.208

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Articles are distributed under Creative Commons Attribution  International 4.0 (CC-BY-NC 4.0) 


Science Works Journal "Ekonomichnyy analiz"

ISSN 1993-0259 (Print)  ISSN 2219-4649 (Online) DOI: 10.35774/econa


© West Ukrainian National University

© «Ekonomichnyy analiz», 2007-2023