Methodological aspects of implementation of benchmarking
Abstract
Methodological aspects of the implementation of benchmarking are investigated. They are considered to be asf the most effective methods to determine compliance with objectives of the enterprise requirements of both domestic and international market. The aim of the study is to develop a theoretical, methodological guidelines and practical recommendations on methodological aspects of the implementation of benchmarking. Studies have shown that there is some ambiguity as to determine the number of views and contents benchmarking process step . It has been offered a division of the benchmarking process into six phases: identification of the object to analyze the benefits, identification of partners due to benefits analysis, processing and grouping of information, analysis, implementation of the obtained information summaries, control the process and re- analysis. It is recommended to establish formally the analysis of advantages in the company as a permanent feature.
Keywords
References
Azoev, G. L. (2000). The competitive advantages of the company [The competitive advantages of the company]. Moscow: OAO "type" News ".
Andersen, B. (2003). Business processes. Tools to improve [ Business processes. Tools to improve]. Moscow: RIA "Standards and Quality".
Gornostaeva, J. V. (2009). Benchmarking in services [Benchmarking in services]. Mines: State Educational Institution "SRSUES".
Lipkan, V. A. (2009). National Security of Ukraine. [National Security of Ukraine] Kyiv: CNT.
Sokolova, E. V. (2007). Benchmarking in infrastructure industries: an analysis of the methodology and practice of application (for example, electricity) [Benchmarking in infrastructure industries: an analysis of the methodology and practice of application (for example, electricity)]. St. Petersburg. : Institute of Management St. Petersburg State University.
Karpenko, N. V. (2007). Benchmarking business processes for small and medium businesses [ Benchmarking business processes for small and medium businesses]. Mechanism of Economic Regulation, 4, 138-149.
Harrington, H. J., Harrington, J. S. (2004). Benchmarking at its best! [Benchmarking at its best!]. St. Petersburg. : Peter.
Maslov, D. V., Belokorovin, E. A. (2005). How to use the opportunity of benchmarking in local conditions [How to use the opportunity of benchmarking in local conditions]. Management of the company, 1.
Arenkov, I. A., Bagiev, E. G. (1997). Benchmarking and marketing solutions [Benchmarking and marketing solutions]. St. Petersburg. : SPbUEF Publishing House.
Goncharuk, A. G. ( 2007). Benchmarking as a method of enterprise performance management [Benchmarking as a method of enterprise performance management]. Proceedings of the Odessa Polytechnic University, 1 (27), 253-258.
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Articles are distributed under Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY-NC 4.0)
Science Works Journal "Ekonomichnyy analiz"
ISSN 1993-0259 (Print) ISSN 2219-4649 (Online) DOI: 10.35774/econa
© West Ukrainian National University
© «Ekonomichnyy analiz», 2007-2023