On the analysis of definitions of interdisciplinary categoryof dysfunction representatives of economics, sociological, politica and, legal sciences justified innovative content of dysfunction which is appropriate to the economy of Ukraine : in the broadest sense - the destruction (complete or partial ) of functional dependence of relations between innovation sphere and the national economy as a whole, the structural elements of the innovation areas: science, education, manufacturing (innovative), the market, innovation infrastructure, innovation process participants that operate on all or some of its stages; subjects of innovation and the state as a regulator, its innovation policy. In a narrow sense , dysfunctional state innovation sphere, which is characterized by its intrinsic lack of balance, instability and external dysfunctional consequences regarding innovative development of the national economy as a whole and its individual structural elements. It is proved that in Ukraine innovative dysfunctionis asystem macroeconomic dysfunction. In its consequences innovative dysfunction is a crisis, as the national economy loses the ability to innovate and is at the lowest point of adaptive efficiency. This is a dysfunction of regulators of innovation. Its cause and simultaneously destructive consequence is a gradual loss of Ukrainian society of human and social capital of innovation.

Research and innovation activities (2000-2011 y ) Retrieved September 15, 2013, from : http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.

Rotar, A. V. (2009). Statistical and economic assessment of innovation in industry. Statistics Ukraine, 3, 50-57.

The innovative activity of industrial enterprises in 2012. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from : www.ukrstat.gov.ua.

Burger, M. (2011). I call this innovatsion dysfunction. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from : http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2011/07/26/1267425834/7.pdf.

Encyclopedic Dictionary of Philosophy. (1997). Moscow: INFRA-M.

Merton, R. K. (2007). Social Theory and Social Structure. Moscow: AST, the Guardian.

Maximov, A. (2011). Synthesis parameters unstable political system. Theory and Methodology of Political Science. VisnykSevNTU : Coll. nauk.pr. Series: Politics, 123, 128 -131.

Oleynikov, S. M. (2012). Archetypes legal culture and legal anticulture dysfunction. Journal of Law Academy of Ukraine named after Yaroslav the Wise. Series, 3 (13), 202-205.

Sukharev, O. S. (2000). Feasibility dysfunction using logistic models dynamics. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from : http://science-bsea.bgita.ru/2000/perspektiv_2000/suharev.htm.

Sukharev, O. S. (2008). Institutional Economics : Theory and Policy. Moskow: Institute of Economics.

Fomin, A. V. (2012). Formation of regulatory. Saratov. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from : http://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-459814.html.

Kienko, T. S. (2009). Institutional Analysis of motivation in social work in contemporary Russia. Rostov -on-Don. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from : http://library.sfedu.ru/referat/D212-208-01.

Iefimenko, I. A. (2010). Main content dysfunction and symptoms of Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine. Economy and region, 2, 11-15.

Sukharev, O. S. (2004). Concepts institutional and evolutionary economics: a short course of lectures. Moscow: Center for evolution. IЄRAN economy.

Eshenko, P., Arseenko, A. G. (2012). Whither the global economy in the XXI century. - K.: Knowledge of Ukraine.

Seminozhenko, V. P. (2011). Which innovation policy is needed Ukraine ? Science and Innovation, 7 (1), 41-44 .

Methods of calculating the economic security of Ukraine, approved the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine № 60 from 02.03.2007. (2007). Retrieved September 15, 2013, from : http://zakon.nau.ua/doc/?uid=1022.4251.0.