Improvement of industrial enterprises brand valuation

Dmytro Anatoliyovych Gorovyi, Dariya Oleksandrivna Prykhodko


Market dynamics, the complexity and opacity of the existing computational models of brand value determine the relevance of improving brand valuation of industry. Brand valuation methods of production (machine-building) enterprises are improved in this article. It allows to evaluate brand image, interaction of customer loyalty with the needs, brand life cycle, time influence on brand, and to consider the integral indicator of the importance of brands basing on certain brand classification features. The article also provides recommendations on the calculation of the components of the proposed method. It is proposed the brand valuation algorithm using IILLT method, that consists of two main parts and recommendation. This algorithm allows consistently and carefully to evaluate the brand value. Advantages of IILLT method are determined. The main advantages are as the following ones: detailed research of the enterprise brand, and there is an opportunity to diagnose the efficiency of previous branding; selection of individual components of the method that provides an opportunity to evaluate the factors that significantly affect the brand valuation for the improvement of future branding activities; prediction of the brand in the future; possibility to search strategic sources of increasing cost. 


brand; classification; value; image; loyalty; life cycle; time

Full Text:



Prykhodko, D. A. (2012). «Interbrand and Finance Brand»: benchmarking study of brand valuation methods [«Interbrand» and «Finance Brand»: benchmarking study of brand valuation methods]. Modern challenges of social and economic development of the Russian Federation: materials of international scientific conference, Belgorod, SRU “BelSU”, 54-57.

Zozulov, O. V. (2002). Branding or Antibranding: What should be selected in Ukraine? [Branding or Antibranding What should be selected in Ukraine?]. Marketing in Ukraine , 4, 26-28.

Panjushkina, S. (n.d.). Brand Methods Estimation [Brand Methods Estimation]. Invet-Gazeta. Retrieved November 22, 2004, from

Aaker’s Methodology [Aaker’s Methodology]. (2008). MORO. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from

Geiyer, G. V. (2006). Financial Brand Value and its Estimation Methods [Financial Brand Value and its Estimation Methods]. UNIVER. Retrieved June 13, 2006, from

Tretiak, O. A. (2010). Brand-Capital: Content, Money Estimation and Management [Brand-Capital: Content, Money Estimation and Management]. ANTEMA. Retrieved May 15, 2010, from soderzhanie_denezhnaya_ocenka_i_upravlenie/

Getman, O. O. (n.d.). Methods and Approaches of Enterprise Intangible Assets Estimation [Methods and Approaches of Enterprise Intangible Assets Estimation]. MANUALS. Retrieved, 2010, from metodi_sposobi_otsinki_nematerialnih_aktiviv_pidpriyemstva.

Berezin, I. (2003). 4D branding – Tomas Ged [4D brending – Tomas Ged]. MARKETOLOGI. Retrieved 2003, from

Method of O. Chernozub [Method of O. Chernozub]. (2008). MORO. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from

Prykhodko, D. O. (2012). Brand Classification Improvement [Brand Classification Improvement]. Problems and perspectives of enterprise development: Collection of research articles of KhNAHU, 2 (3), 50-55.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c)


Articles are distributed under Creative Commons Attribution  International 4.0 (CC-BY-NC 4.0) 

Science Works Journal "Ekonomichnyy analiz"

ISSN 1993-0259 (Print)  ISSN 2219-4649 (Online) DOI: 10.35774/econa

© West Ukrainian National University

© «Ekonomichnyy analiz», 2007-2023