Methods of companies intellectual property management: process approach
Abstract
Introduction. Effective enterprises intellectual property management is an important way to increase the efficiency of the enterprise. Formation of the intellectual property assets increases and strengthens its competitive advantage. However, at the domestic enterprises there are many problems in the management of the latter. The questions as for use of modern management techniques need to be clarified. Especially it concerns the process approach.
Purpose. The aim of the article is the analysis and justification of methods of forming the system of companies intellectual property management on the basis of the process approach.
The method (methodology). The study is based on the use of complex general and special techniques and methods of scientific knowledge. Thus for the study of theoretical positions as for the use of different methods of process approach we have applied historical and logical, synthesis and classification of abstraction methods. To discover the subject of study and the relationship of its components we have used the methods of detalization and synthesis. Information base has been composed of legislative and regulatory legal acts of Ukraine, foreign and domestic scientific publications.
Results. It has been carried out the analysis of modern management techniques on the basis of the process approach, which include: management by objectives (Management by Objectives); controlling (management according to deviations); TQM (Total Quality Management); Shuhart-Deming cycle (PDCA); the method of "six sigma"; business process reengineering (Business Process Reengineering); benchmarking. The features of application of each method, their advantages and disadvantages are analysed. It has been proved that to control the processes of formation of intellectual property management it is appropriate use such methods as method of management according to objectives, total management quality method; cycle PDCA, reengineering and benchmarking.
Keywords
References
Fajol', A. Jemerson, G., Tejlor, F., Ford, G. (1992). Upravlenie – jeto nauka i iskusstvo. Moscow: Delo.
Deming, Je. (2007). Vyhod iz krizisa: Novaja paradigma upravlenija ljud'mi, sistemami i processami. Moscow: Al'pina Biznes Buks.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantages: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
Davenport, T. N. (1993). Business Innovation, Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kuz'min, O. Ye. (2012). Kontseptsiya ta evolyutsiya protsesno-strukturovanoho menedzhmentu. Ekonomika: realiyi chasu, 2 (3), 7-16. Retrieved from: http://www.economics.opu.ua/n3.html.
Kuznetsova, I. O. (2011). Paradyhmy protsesnoho pidkhodu v menedzhmenti: sutnist' ta protyrichchya. Visnyk Khmel'nyts'koho natsional'noho universytetu, 2(2), 64-68.
Bezhin, K. S., Hryshyna, I. V. (2009). Porivnyal'nyy analiz protsesnoho ta funktsional'noho pidkhodiv do upravlinnya pidpryyemstvom. Visnyk ekonomichnoyi nauky Ukrayiny, 2 (16), 3-7.
Ivlev, V., Popova, T. (n. d.). Processnaja organizacija dejatel'nosti predprijatija. Retrieved from: http://quality. eup.ru/DOCUM/podp.htm.
Krivoruchko, O. N. (2011). Processno-orientirovannaja sistema upravlenija predprijatiem. Ekonomіka transportnogo kompleksu, 18, 22-34.
Cyganok, A. O. (n. d.). Processnyj podhod – revoljucija v upravlenii? Retrieved from: http://www.tsyganok.ru/pubs/pub.asp?id=2053.
Verba, V. A. & Hrebeshkova, O. M. (2011). Upravlinnya rozvytkom kompaniyi. Kyyiv: KNEU.
Babak, O. A. (2011). Reinzhynirynh yak suchasnyy instrument innovatsiynoyi diyal'nosti pidpryyemstv. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Pereyaslav-Khmel'nyts'koho DPU, 17/1, 55–60.
Grishina, I. V., Bezgin, K. S. (2009). Analiz osnovnyh metodov upravlenija kachestvom biznes-processov na predprijatii. Vіsnik Hmel'nic'kogo nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu, 3 (1), 89-98.
Druker, P. (2003). Praktika menedzhmenta. Moscow: Vil'jams.
Morrisej, Dzh. (1979). Celevoe upravlenie organizaciej. Moscow: Sov. Radio.
Odiorne, G. S. (1965). Management by Objectives. New York: Pitman.
Raia, A. P. (1968). Management by Objective in Theory and Practice. Southern Journal of Business, 2, 11-20.
Koncepcija kontrollinga: Upravlencheskij uchet. Sistema otchetnosti. Bjudzhetirovanie (2005). Moscow : Al'bina Biznes Buks.
Han, D. & Hungenberg, H. PiK. (2005). Stoimostno-orientirovannaja koncepcija kontrolinga. Moscow: Finansy i statistika.
Sokolova, L. V. & Shkil', N. H. (2012). Analiz teoretychnykh i praktychnykh aspektiv protsesno-oriyentovanoho upravlinnya piidpryyemstvom. Biznes-Inform, 9, 278-281.
Shewhart, W. (1939). Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control. N. Y.: Dover Publ., Inc.
Nojmann, Je. (2004). Kachestvo na urovne Shest' Sigma. Dnepropetrovsk: Balans-Klub.
Pande, P. (2005). Chto takoe Shest' sigma? Revoljucionnyj metod upravlenija kachestvom. Moscow: Al'pina Biznes Buks.
Hjerri, M. & Shreder, R. (2003). 6 SIGMA. Moscow: Jeksmo.
Fomichev, S. K., Skrjabina N. I., Urazlina O. Ju. (2004). Koncepcii «Shest' sigm» i «Berezhlivoe upravlenie»: Zvezdnyj sojuz. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva, 6, 16-20.
Hammer, M., Champi, Dzh. (2006). Reinzhiniring korporacii: manifest revoljucii v biznese. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber.
Robson, M. (1997). Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po reinzhiniringu biznes-processov. Moscow: Audit, JuNITI.
Andersen, B. (2003). Biznes-processy. Instrumenty sovershenstvovanija. Moscow: RIA «Standarty i kachestvo».
Rejder, R. (2007). Benchmarking kak instrument opredelenija strategii i povyshenija pribyli. Moscow: RIA «Standarty i kachestvo.
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Articles are distributed under Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY-NC 4.0)
Science Works Journal "Ekonomichnyy analiz"
ISSN 1993-0259 (Print) ISSN 2219-4649 (Online) DOI: 10.35774/econa
© West Ukrainian National University
© «Ekonomichnyy analiz», 2007-2023